Showing posts with label exam preparation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exam preparation. Show all posts

Saturday, May 27, 2023

Excellent Advice for Chemistry Teachers

 The WA 2022 ATAR course examination report for Chemistry offers some excellent advice for all teachers of chemistry,

"Teach general concepts from first principles so that students can apply concepts to unfamiliar situations, not just write everything they know."
If you had shown this to me in 2019, I would have been shocked to think that any chemistry teacher wasn't teaching concepts from first principles, but COVID19 really did fundamentally change the way teachers were forced to teach, and how students were forced to study. "Remote learning" encouraged a return to the "bad-old-days" of rote learning "facts" and "how-to"s as a means to obtaining an end (success in exams). Unfortunately, once these electronic measures had been put in place (rather hurriedly in most cases), nobody seems to want to revisit this hasty construct and replace it with something better. There is a huge opportunity here to begin teaching chemistry as a science, using the scientific method, but no, we continue to teach students how to answer exam questions.
This is not education, it is training. And it is training of the worst kind since the ability to answer exam questions is not very useful in the workforce or in adult life.
Heed the advice, "Teach general concepts from first principles so that students can apply concepts to unfamiliar situations", and bad training becomes great education.

Saturday, October 31, 2020

How to study for Chemistry exams

As your chemistry exam gets closer, I'm sure you've been "studying" hard, probably reading through your notes, making summaries, summarizing the summaries, putting important concepts on flash cards... and a whole lot more. But will any of that help you achieve a good result on a chemistry exam?

Probably not. So, put your notes away and read on.

Chemistry examiners are not interested in whether you have memorized the "facts" (definitions, formulae etc). It is most unlikely that the following question will appear on a chemistry exam paper,

Question 1: "State Le Chatelier's Principle"

Chemistry examiners are interested in how you apply chemical principles to solve problems. So the following question is much more likely to be found on a chemistry exam paper,

Question 2: "A student dissolves some solid FeSCN2+ in water in a test tube at room temperature and pressure, producing a mixture of reddish-brown FeSCN2+(aq), pale yellow Fe3+(aq), and colourless SCN-(aq). The student observes that the test tube feels cooler as the solute dissolves.

(a) Write an equation to describe the process.

(b) Describe what colour change, if any, would occur if the test tube was placed in an ice-bath. Explain your answer"

Question 2 is asking you to apply Le Chatelier's Principle to a given chemical process.

The best way to study for your chemistry exam is to answer a variety of questions. AUS-e-TUTE Members have access to thousands of problems (with worked solutions and tutorials if you need some help). If you are not an AUS-e-TUTE member you can often find books of problems for a given course, and you probably have access to "past papers". 

Here's another question you might like to try,

Question 3: One step in the Ostwald process for manufacturing nitric acid from ammonia involves the production of nitrogen dioxide as shown in the chemical equation below:

2NO(g) + O2(g) ⇋ 2NO2(g)

A 10.00 L reaction vessel initially contained 2.50 mol NO(g) and 1.20 mol O2(g).

0.50 mol NO(g) remained in the vessel after equilibrium was established.

(a) Calculate the equilibrium constant for this reaction.

(b) A second experiment was conducted using the same initial amounts of NO(g) and O2(g) but in a reaction vessel of about half the volume. What affect would this have on the value of the equilibrium constant? Explain your answer. 

If you find these questions a bit tricky, then AUS-e-TUTE might help you become more familiar with exam-type questions and how to answer them. Join AUS-e-TUTE today

Thursday, August 8, 2019

How to Maximise Marks in Your Chemistry Exam

Are you ready for your chemistry exam?
The Sydney Morning Herald provided 8 dot points to help you answer Chemistry exam questions, which we have expanded out below:
ALWAYS check that you have answered the question that was asked, and not provided an answer to a question that you wish had been on the paper!

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Problem Solving in Chemistry

Some years ago, AUS-e-TUTE added a "how to solve problems in chemistry" page.
We call this approach to problem solving the StoPGoPS method:
  1. Stop: State the question.
  2. Pause: Prepare a plan of how you will solve the problem'
  3. Go! Follow the steps in your plan.
  4. Pause: Ponder the plausibility of your answer. (Have you answered the question you were asked? Does the answer look "about right"?
  5. Stop: State your solution (if your answer seems plausible) or Start again (if your answer doesn't look right)
Well, we have now added a Template that students can use to help guide them through the Problem Solving Process. You can download this "Template for Problem Solving" pdf at ausetute.com.au for free.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

IUPAC Nomenclature and Organic Compounds

Imagine you are sitting a Chemistry exam.
The first question on the exam paper reads,
"Name the molecule shown below:"

How would you answer this question?

My first response is to name it Molly, short for molecule ofcourse. Not a very useful name, especially if I'm asked to name another molecule later on. It might get a bit confusing if I name every molecule Molly, even when the molecules are very different from each other.

So, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) has developed systems for naming compounds.
For this reason, you probably won't be asked to "name" the molecule, but you might be asked to "systematically name" the molecule, or to give the "systematic IUPAC name" for the molecule.

Even for the relatively simple molecule shown above, there is more than one way to systematically name the molecule using IUPAC nomenclature rules!

You could give a systematic IUPAC name based on the functional class of the compound. This molecule belongs to the functional class known as ketones (non-terminal C=O), two methyl (CH3) groups are attached to the carbonyl carbon atom, so, according to the IUPAC rules for functional class nomenclature, I could systematically name it as dimethyl ketone.

I could give the same molecule a different systematic IUPAC name by applying the rules of substitutive nomenclature. In this case I name the parent hydride, propane, drop the final "e" and add a suffix denoting the non-terminal C=O functional group so that I get propanone, then I add in an infix which locates the functional group along the carbon chain, with the final name propan-2-one.

Because this is a simple molecule with just one functional group, I could use the infix as a prefix, so that the systematic IUPAC name would become 2-propanone. Or, because there is only one position for the C=O functional group to be in if this molecule is to be a ketone, I could drop the infix altogether and just systematically name the molecule as propanone.

So, some of the possible systematic IUPAC names for this molecule are:
  • dimethyl ketone
  • propan-2-one
  • 2-propanone
  • propanone
Because molecules can be named systematically in more than one way, there is a recommendation to adopt "preferred IUPAC names", or PINs. Usually the Preferred IUPAC Name is arrived at by using one of the recognized IUPAC systems for nomenclature, but not always.

If you were asked to give the Preferred IUPAC Name for the molecule shown above, the correct answer would be acetone ("Preferred names in the nomenclature of organic compounds" (Draft 7 October 2004) page 9), or, possibly propan-2-one ("Preferred names in the nomenclature of organic compounds" (Draft 7 October 2004) page 374). Acetone is the traditional name for this compound, literally meaning 'derived from acetic acid', and has been in use for more than 200 years, which is probably why the IUPAC would consider retaining the name "acetone" as the Preferred IUPAC Name for this compound.

Further Reading:
Introduction to Naming Organic Compounds

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Problem Solving in Chemistry

Chemistry students are expected to be able to solve chemistry problems.
On every exam paper, there will be an assortment of problems for students to solve.
Sometimes they do it well, sometimes they do it OK, and sometimes they do it badly.
Often, we give students time before exams to practice answering exam questions.
But how often do chemistry teachers actually explicitly teach problem solving skills?
Often we expect students to "follow our lead" when we demonstrate how to solve particular problems, but do we ever give them a good general framework that they could use to solve any problem they are likely to face in exams?
Most likely the answer is no.
"Surely, by the time students get to the senior years of high school they should be able to solve problems right?" I hear you ask.
While this is a reasonable expectation, the reality is that quite a few can't, just try reading the annual examiners reports and you will get a feel for the kinds of difficulties many students face when trying to solve problems.
So, I've spent some time doing some reading, quite a lot of thinking, and more typing than I'd like, in order to produce a framework for problem solving in chemistry.

You can see the results on the AUS-e-TUTE page on Problem Solving in Chemistry:
http://www.ausetute.com.au/stopgops.html

and a results-only demonstration of the problem solving process in action has been added to the bottom of the amended Dilution Calculations page:
http://www.ausetute.com.au/dilucalc.html

The problem solving page might seem like a lot of reading, but once your students become familiar with the process it is really very quick. It helps them identify potential difficulties BEFORE they actually start doing calculations, ensures they answer the question they were asked and that they check the answer to make sure it is reasonable.

If you happen to teach physics and/or maths as well as chemistry, the method can be applied to these subjects as well.

Because acronyms are useful, I've called this the StoPGoPS approach to problem solving, for reasons that will become self-evident when you read the problem solving page, and I've used a set of traffic lights as a visual aid to recall.

Please feel free to comment on the usefulness of this problem solving model.

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Spelling Mistakes vs Incorrect Science

It's that time of year in Australia when tens of thousands of students get ready to sit their final exams.
For many of these students it will be the first time they have sat an external assessment, that is, these exams will not be marked by teachers who know them. This time there will be no kindly teacher marking the exam paper and thinking, "oh dear, well I know what Chris really meant ....", this time a complete stranger will be sitting in front of your paper, and not only that, a complete stranger who has by now had to try to read and mark thousands of papers, and this stranger is only going to give you a mark based on exactly what you did write NOT on what he/she thinks you might have meant!

Which brings me to the subject of this discussion. 
When is a spelling mistake (typo) going to be marked as wrong on a Chemistry exam paper?
A spelling mistake will be marked wrong if it introduces ambiguity into your answer or if it makes what you are saying scientifically incorrect.

Spelling mistakes that will be probably not be marked as wrong include misplaced apostrophes, for example it's instead of its, or misspelling non-science-specific-words like using 'their' instead of 'there', as long as this does not alter the scientific meaning of what you have written.

Spelling mistakes that will definitely be marked wrong are those that make your answer scientifically "wrong".
In chemistry, changing just one letter in a word can have an enormous impact!
For example, ethane has the molecular formula C2H6 and is a saturated, and not very reactive, hydrocarbon. On the other hand, ethyne has the molecular formula C2H2 and is an unsaturated, and very reactive, hydrocarbon. Changing one letter, an a to a y, has a huge impact on the formula and properties of the compound! If you start writing about the addition of bromine to ethane instead of ethyne you will, and certainly should be, marked wrong.
Then there is the problem of capitalization, which is very important when writing chemical formula.
If you write Co then you have given the chemical symbol for the transition metal cobalt, but if you write CO you have given the molecular formula for the covalent compound carbon monoxide. Just using a lowercase letter instead of a capital (uppercase) letter  has changed the substance from a metallic element to a covalent compound! So, if you start talking about the metallic bonding of CO in the solid state at room temperature and pressure, you will be marked wrong.

After you have written an answer to an exam question, read the question again. Then read your answer. Make sure you have written an answer to the question that was asked, and, make sure that your answer says what you meant it to say! Be on the look-out for those spelling mistakes (typos) that could lose you marks.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Exam Technique 1

I've never written a blog post about exam technique before, but after reading the following question on an exam paper, I felt the time had come to broach the subject.

Imagine being a High School Chemistry student who is confronted by the following scenario on an exam paper:
  • Written information that tells you that the diagram refers to an experiment to model a process and observe the colour change of crystals.
  • A diagram of a dessicator (labelled as a sealed container) containing a watch glass of copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate (no indication of colour) and a beaker labelled Liquid X.
  • And the instruction that the student must identify Liquid X and explain the colour change of the crystals.

So, where do you start, given that you have so very little information to go on?

You might start with the dessicator (assuming you have recognized it as a dessicator and that you know what it is used for). This would suggest that, whatever this 'process' is, it is effected by water.

That copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate could also be a clue. It is copper(II) sulfate that is hydrated, CuSO4.5H2O, so if you are taking the trouble to keep moisture out of the dessicator, then maybe Liquid X in the beaker is a dessicant, something that will remove water from the air, and hence from the copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate.

Now, you would need to know, or infer from the question, that there is a colour change involved. Copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate is actually blue, while anhydrous copper(II) sulphate is off-white in colour.

But you still haven't answered the first part of the question, you must identify Liquid X. And this is where it becomes very, very, difficult. If you are sensible at this point, you might just call Liquid X a dessicant, and hope the exam markers will accept that. Otherwise you are going to come up against the nasty problem of naming a dessicant that is a liquid (not a solution, not a gel, but a liquid). So, is there such a dessicant?

Silica gel is a commonly used dessicant, but it is not a liquid, it is a very solid-like gel.

Lots of solids are commonly used as dessicants, including activated carbon, calcium sulphate, calcium chloride, and swelling-clay minerals like bentonite. You can even use sodium hydroxide as a dessicant.

Strangely enough, the term "liquid dessicant" is used in the air-conditioning industry, but the dessicant is not a liquid, it is usually solid lithium chloride.

Well, I haven't had any luck coming up with the name of a liquid dessicant.

Clearly, we have started off in the wrong direction. The resemblance of the vessel to a dessicator is probably a red-herring, something put into the question in order to get you to think along the wrong lines. Is the use of hydrated copper(II) sulphate also a red-herring?

Well, I'll keep working on the problem, but, if I was a student trying to complete the exam within the time-limit, I would have realized that this question was only worth 3 marks, and I couldn't afford to spend more than about 5 minutes on it....